Premise

The Vrishabhavathi river runs through the south-western parts of Bengaluru and Ramanagara district for about 69 kms. With a catchment area of 170 sq-km, the minor river carries the toxic wastewater of one-third of Bengaluru which is approximately 500 MLD. The river is flanked by large industrial areas in Peenya, Yeshwanthpur, Kumbalgodu, Bidadi and Harohalli. It meanders past dense residential neighbourhoods, prestigious institutions, shopping malls, temples and farmlands before emptying itself into the Arkavathy river. As it passes close to national parks, this polluted wastewater becomes wildlife’s drinking water source. The Vrishabhavathi then feeds into the Arkavati near Kanakapura town. This river has been designated as ‘critically polluted’ by the pollution control board. 

The Vrishabhavathi river runs through the south-western parts of Bengaluru and Ramanagara district for about 69 kms. With a catchment area of 170 sq-km, the minor river carries the toxic wastewater of one-third of Bengaluru which is approximately 500 MLD. The river is flanked by large industrial areas in Peenya, Yeshwanthpur, Kumbalgodu, Bidadi and Harohalli. It meanders past dense residential neighbourhoods, prestigious institutions, shopping malls, temples and farmlands before emptying itself into the Arkavathy river. As it passes close to national parks, this polluted wastewater becomes wildlife’s drinking water source. The Vrishabhavathi then feeds into the Arkavati near Kanakapura town. This river has been designated as ‘critically polluted’ by the pollution control board.  

Concern

Un-built, natural systems are usually very difficult to conserve. Without a concrete presence, these fragmented systems are never seen in their entirety. As a result of this, the Vrishabhavathi and its catchment, once actively used resources, have over time been built over, blocked and polluted. An unprecedented increase in urban population has had a telling impact on the Vrishabhavathi valley. From 1973 to 2017, there has reportedly been a 1028% increase in concretization or paving in the city, with a resultant decrease in lakes and green cover. With the provision of piped water supply from the Cauvery, the idea of the river (and its keres) as a holistic system, has all but receded from public memory. The kere today is only as valuable as the real estate it provides, and the river is only appreciated in its capacity to drain the city’s waste, defining it as a case of lost potential and lost lung space in a city that’s rapidly densifying.

However, though the educated urban resident (of the above narrative) is a key stakeholder of the river, s(he) is only one of the many users who directly (or indirectly) depend upon the Vrishabhavatih’s resources. For instance, the major impact of mindless resource extraction upstream (in the city), is felt by farmers downstream. The contamination of peri-urban agricultural lands and the simultaneous rise in water shortage, testifies as evidence of increasing exploitation. Cancer, thyroid disruption, diabetes, obesity, asthma and infertility are health burdens that are quietly taking their toll in the catchment of the river, more so in the downstream areas, where farmers are forced to use this polluted waste-water for sustaining their livelihoods.

Further, the loss of natural resources has collectively sidelined scores of urban resource dependent communities, like potters and dhobis. Added to this is the stress that this degradation is causing to resident bio-diversity.

These disparate stakeholder groups are rarely represented together, making it extremely difficult to understand and communicate the existent complexity of the river. More than anything, it is necessary for people to actively engage with the river and to take responsibility for their role in its conservation. For the polluters, i.e, the urban resident, the industries, the polluters and the encroachers, this means that they would have to understand the implication of their activities. This understanding of individual responsibility will only come with an understanding of the issues on ground. For the latter, i.e, for the communities marginalized by these activities, it would mean understanding the perpetrators, the causes, as well as their rights and capacities.

More than anything, to make a case for the Vrishabhavati’s value, it is imperative to create a holistic picture of the river, one that discusses stories of its engagement with various stakeholders. At the scale of the river, there is a need for concentrated, sensitive effort, to bring together multiple stakeholders. Saving the Vrishabhavati is a momentous task, requiring one to see multiple natural, social, cultural and political forces at work. Few people are able to see these connections, largely because there is no cohesive, stakeholder-centric narrative.

Overview of existing efforts

NGO’s such as Biome Environmental Trust and the Bangalore Environmental Trust (BET) are working on compiling information on the city’s water systems. BET, for instance, has started a website on environmental policy work (https://bngenvtrust.org/), with a section devoted to the Vrishabhavathi and Arkavathi river systems. They are engaged in building a satellite map of the river, which currently delineates key nodes and catalysts. Apart from this map, they also use news articles, reports and legal documents, as modes of communication.

 

Though this approach is important, the relative technicality of these information sources, make them inaccessible to most readers. For the information to reach a wider audience, it needs to capture the interest of the readers and encourage them to understand the multi-dimensionality of the river system.  Representing information in its raw form will not facilitate this process. Also, in order to make these issues relatable, the communication systems need to be curated to transcend barriers like those of age or education or society.

Therefore, as we’re looking to sensitively address these objectives, it becomes necessary to curate a uniquely designed communication system that articulates a grounded narrative of the Vrishabhavathi.

Vrishabhavati - Arkavati map by Paani.Earth

Aim of the project 

To design an effective means of communication, that will convey information about the Vrishabhavati and its relationships with various stakeholder types. In doing so, the narrative will establish connections, across ages, backgrounds and social categories.

Bringing transparency and clarity to policies surrounding river systems in the city through accessible visualization of data and stories is the medium (that we as designers feel), has maximum reach. Vrishabavati, in its myriad interfaces holds accountable various stakeholders. To be able to narrate issues as visual proof of our apathy and to make it relatable to every individual, is a task we wish to initiate so as to educate every stakeholder and create accountability over the Vrishabhavati. We wish to narrate intangible connections, to document the river’s living culture and its socio-ecological systems.

We wish to challenge the standard static product-oriented design method, in favour of a more collaborative, malleable process. The information is not something that we want to thrust at readers, but rather something that we will evolve from a general consensus and a collaborative effort.  Using this as a tool to bring about policy change is a long-term offshoot that we hope to achieve.

Themes considered

THEME 1: Challenges to sustaining traditional water dependent livelihoods in the city

Story 1: The dhobis in Bangalore once used lake water to sustain themselves. Today, with the formalization and drying up of lakes in the city, they have been left with dwindling water sources. The Dhobi Ghat in Malleshwaram is one such case. However, they have both a solution and a demand to ask of the government. They say, that if they are given an effluent treatment plant at a government subsidy, they will be able to treat their own grey water and re-use it. They argue that if the nearby Peenya industries are receiving the plant at a subsidy then they should be considered for it as well.

THEME 2: Flood vulnerability and impact on urban slums in the Vrishabhavati valley

This story will take forward a news article that discussed the concerns of residents and shop keepers near the gali Anjaneya temple in Bangalore.

THEME 3: Regulatory loopholes and industrial pollution in the Vrishabhavati

Bangalore and its peri-urban fringes support a large industrial economy. Several of these industrial areas lie directly on the banks of the Vrishabhavati and drain their pollutants into it, often flouting regulations and norms.

This story will be a visualization of an ATREE study that suggests that major effluent discharge from the Peenya industrial area seems to be happening at night, in large quantities. As this is not the time at which KSPCB collects samples, these activities go under the radar. (https://www.atree.org/book-chapter/addressing-pollution-urban-rivers-what-we-learnt-vrishabhavathy-river-bengaluru). We are also looking to build on this story with accounts and interviews from industry representatives and KSPCB representatives. Similarly, from the 18th of August to the 12th of December 2020, residents of Krishna Gardens near the Channasandra stream noticed chemical waste being dumped into the stream. As a result of this the stream turned an unnatural yellow color. Here too, the discharge occurred in the early hours of the morning, in order to evade detection by authorities.

THEME 4: Understanding NIMBY in Bangalore City

Provident Sunworth apartments, downstream of the city, is a gated colony on the banks of the Vrishabhavati river. In this area the water naturally slows down because of the presence of a large stone in the river bed. Farmers here, benefit from this situation, and tap out this untreated water to use for irrigation, causing a foul smell in the area. Provident Sunworth, for its part is appealing to authorities to remove this stone.

THEME 6: Water inequalities in the Vrishabhavati

This story explores the case of Pepsi Cola in the Bidadi Industrial area, which receives clean Cauvery water at the cost of the residents who live in this area. It brings to the table the question of fairly distributing rights to clean water.

THEME 7: Vrishabhavati and its agrarian dependencies

Story 1: This story explores the response to the Byramangala diversion canal, which seeks to by-pass the lake and take the toxic water downstream to Harohalli Industrial area. The story will document accounts from multiple sources including BET (who filed a PIL), the local gram Panchayath and resident farmers.

Story 2: This story will document the case of a farmer Muniraju, who, in the absence of clean water, successfully started growing Mulberry using untreated sewage water. Though this story has already been sufficiently discussed (https://www.bbc.com/news/av/science-environment-45133277), it is still valuable here as a narrative of agrarian resilience.

THEME 8: Vrishabhavati and the threats to Bio-diversity

Story 1: Downstream of the Vrishabhavati is the Cauvery wildlife sanctuary, an elephant corridor. Toxins added upstream from detergents in urban households, make this water undrinkable. Here, as per farmer testimonials, in the absence of potable water, these elephants turn violent.

Story 2: The other story will explore the story of the Humpback Mahseer, endemic to this stretch of the Cauvery and the threats to its  survival.

THEME 9: The environmental cost of the recycling industry

This story will explore the relatively unknown cost of the plastic and e-waste recycling industry in Kumbalgodu, which functions on the banks of the Vrishabhavati, under the radar of local governance bodies.

THEME 10: The Vrishabhavati and her right to existence

In this story we will be exploring ideas of The Vrishabhavati’s identity as an individual in her own right. The story will explore the phenomenon of cultural positioning of rivers as individuals, contrasted with modern conceptions of natural resources as utilities.

Collaborators

Funded by

Collaborators

Funded by

Collaborators

Funded by

Collaborators

Funded by

Collaborators

Funded by